Apple’s Brand No Nos 101
Permalink | Comment (0)WTF is Apple “thinking”:3?
Recently, Apple “sues”:1 Think Secret, Apple Insider and PowerPage, because they reported on some “secret” Apple information recently (such as pre-release details on the Mac Mini and iPod Shuffle). Genius! Then they decide to “punish” the publisher, Wiley & Sons, of an upcoming, unauthorized biography of Steve Jobs by pulling all Wiley & Sons books from Apple stores. Brilliant!
Fortunately, Wiley & Sons has integrity (which is apparently a scarce commodity at Apple) and plans to go forward and publish the biography entitled “_iCon Steve Jobs: The Greatest Second Act in the History of Buisness_”:2, by Jeffrey Young.
First, this strategy — if you can call it that — is doomed to fail. Banning books from Apple Stores is sure to be controversial, will generate lots of press and will only end up enhancing _iCons_ sales. Second, does any company really want to have their brand associated with draconian attempts to control the media? In this case, I guess Apple does. And you thought the guys and gals in Redmond were bad.
I only have two words related to how Apple is acting: North Korea.
[3(Apple's Think Different ad)]http://www.apple.com/thinkdifferent/ad1.html
[2(Amazon page for iCon)]http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0471720836/qid=1114729185
[1(CNet OpEd on these lawsuits)]http://news.com.com/Apple+lawsuit+Thinking+different/2010-1047_3-5611497.html
