<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed version="0.3" xmlns="http://purl.org/atom/ns#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xml:lang="en">
<title>Zoinger</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/" />
<modified>2005-04-14T00:59:47Z</modified>
<tagline></tagline>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2006://2</id>
<generator url="http://www.movabletype.org/" version="3.15">Movable Type</generator>
<copyright>Copyright (c) 2005, DanoSchmano</copyright>
<entry>
<title>This Blog is Dead &amp;#8212; Long Live the New Blog!</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/13/16.53.29/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-14T00:59:47Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-14T00:53:29Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.148</id>
<created>2005-04-14T00:53:29Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Ok, the wait is over. This will be the last post for this (old) blog, so you&amp;#8217;ll have to update your bookmarks and RSS feeds to the new Zoinger. The new blog is located here (http://www.zoinger.com/words/) and the new RSS...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Whatever</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Ok, the wait is over. This will be the last post for this (old) blog, so you&#8217;ll have to update your bookmarks and <span class="caps">RSS </span>feeds to the new Zoinger. The new blog is located <a href="http://www.zoinger.com/words/">here</a> (http://www.zoinger.com/words/) and the new <span class="caps">RSS </span>feed is located <a href="http://www.zoinger.com/words/feed/">here</a> (http://www.zoinger.com/words/feed/).</p>

<p>The index page for this (old) blog will now be located <a href="http://www.zoinger.com/old_blog.html">here</a> (http://www.zoinger.com/old_blog.html) if you are interested in reading any of my old posts. I&#8217;ll also have this linked to from the sidebar of the new blog. </p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Zoinger RSS Feeds to Change Soon</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/12/20.41.53/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-13T04:45:36Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-13T04:41:53Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.147</id>
<created>2005-04-13T04:41:53Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Well, I&amp;#8217;ve been reading up in detail on WordPress, and it looks like I&amp;#8217;m going to have to change the URL for the Zoinger RSS feeds. Sorry in advance for any inconvienience this is going to cause. I&amp;#8217;ll probably be...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Movable Type</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve been reading up in detail on WordPress, and it looks like I&#8217;m going to have to change the <span class="caps">URL </span>for the Zoinger <span class="caps">RSS </span>feeds. Sorry in advance for any inconvienience this is going to cause.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ll probably be changing over in the next day or so, but will let you know what the new feed <acronym title="s">URL</acronym> is/are when I do the change over. I&#8217;m planning on keeping the entire MT site live so old <span class="caps">URL</span>s to the posts won&#8217;t break.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>More on Moving to WordPress</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/11/16.57.45/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-12T01:07:39Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-12T00:57:45Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.146</id>
<created>2005-04-12T00:57:45Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">As I&amp;#8217;ve written about previously, I&amp;#8217;m in the (slow) process of moving my blogging application from MovableType over the WordPress. WordPress has got momentum behind it, so I think it&amp;#8217;s going to be more future-proof than MT. Anyway, a sneak...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Movable Type</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>As I&#8217;ve written about <a href="http://www.zoinger.com/wordpress/">previously</a>, I&#8217;m in the (slow) process of moving my blogging application from MovableType over the WordPress. WordPress has got <a href="http://www.zoinger.com/wordpress/">momentum</a> behind it, so I think it&#8217;s going to be more future-proof than <span class="caps">MT.</span></p>

<p>Anyway, a sneak preview of my WordPress blog is available <a href="http://www.zoinger.com/wordpress/">here</a>. I&#8217;m obviously still working on the sidebar links and such.</p>

<p>I installed a new theme over the weekend, which was a piece of cake. I also did some quick edits to the main <span class="caps">CSS </span>file to change the look and feel a bit. I&#8217;m a little unsure about how I&#8217;m going to do the transition&#8230; I&#8217;ll thinking that I might move the pointer for Zoinger.com to my WordPress directory, or I might create a jump page for Zoinger.com which will have links to the blog. WordPress also allows you to create a manage static pages.</p>

<p>So far, I&#8217;m really impressed by the easy-of-use and great <a href="http://codex.wordpress.org/Main_Page">documentation</a> of WordPress.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Memory Maps  &amp;#8212;  Why Yahoo! Bought Flickr Reason #126</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/08/15.06.19/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-08T23:15:55Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-08T23:06:19Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.145</id>
<created>2005-04-08T23:06:19Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I was reading the Flickr Blog today and came across this post about &amp;#8220;memory maps.&amp;#8221; The idea is that you post a screen shot of an area you are familiar with (from a service like Google Maps), and annotate the...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Biz - Internet</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>I was reading the <a href="http://blog.flickr.com/flickrblog/">Flickr Blog</a> today and came across this <a href="http://blog.flickr.com/flickrblog/2005/04/memory_maps.html">post</a> about &#8220;memory maps.&#8221; The idea is that you post a screen shot of an area you are familiar with (from a service like Google <a href="http://maps.google.com">Maps</a>), and annotate the screen shot with your memories. Wild!</p>

<p>Here&#8217;s part of a picture from the Memory Maps Flickr group showing an example of the annotations.<br />
<img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/flickr_memory_maps.png" alt="" /></p>

<p>Just make sure you have a browser that has Flash enabled so you can view the annotations.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Google Maps Satellite View vs. TerraServer</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/08/09.02.12/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-08T23:40:40Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-08T17:02:12Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.144</id>
<created>2005-04-08T17:02:12Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">This is probably not news to anyone but me, but I just noticed that Google Maps now has a &amp;#8220;satellite&amp;#8221; view. This displays an aerial photo of the area you are looking at. However, if you&amp;#8217;re looking to zoom in...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Biz - Internet</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>This is probably not news to anyone but me, but I just noticed that Google Maps now has a &#8220;satellite&#8221; view. This displays an aerial photo of the area you are looking at.</p>

<p>However, if you&#8217;re looking to zoom in further than Google allows, it&#8217;s worth checking Microsoft&#8217;s <a href="http://terraserver.microsoft.com/">TerraServer</a>. For areas that they have recently updated (such as Palo Alto, CA), you can zoom in much further than Google. In addition, the TerraServer offers older aerial shots and topo map overlays.</p>

<p>Here&#8217;s a screen shot of 500 University in Palo Alto, CA  from Google at maximum zoom:<br />
<img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/maps_google.png" alt="" /></p>]]>
<![CDATA[<p>And here&#8217;s one of the same area from the TerraServer dated 2/2004 at maximum zoom:<br />
<img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/maps_msft.png" alt="" /></p>

<p>And another from the TerraServer dated 10/91 at maximum zoom:<br />
<img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/maps_msft_91.png" alt="" /></p>

<p>And finally a topo map view from the TerraServer dated 7/98:<br />
<img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/maps_msft_topo.png" alt="" /></p>

<p>(I zoomed out one level to show a bit more of the region&#8230; of course this part of Palo Alto is pan flat, so not much to show regarding topology.)</p>

<p>Hopefully, Microsoft will update their UI a bit, since Google&#8217;s UI is clearly superior. I can&#8217;t wait until Yahoo! offers this type of service. That is, the more competition the better (for the users anyway!).</p>]]>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>How &quot;Good&quot; Are RSS Ads?</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/07/12.33.01/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-07T20:44:58Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-07T20:33:01Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.143</id>
<created>2005-04-07T20:33:01Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">By &amp;#8220;good&amp;#8221; I mean would I actually click on one, and is the click-on result relevant to the content. In my post on why RSS ads are important, I wrote about how this article discussing MobileTracker.net&amp;#8217;s use of Feedburner&amp;#8217;s feed-serving...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Biz - Internet</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>By &#8220;good&#8221; I mean would I actually click on one, and is the click-on result relevant to the content.</p>

<p>In my <a href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/06/19.35.57/">post</a> on why <span class="caps">RSS </span>ads are important, I wrote about how this <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3439321">article</a> discussing <a href="http://www.MobileTracker.net">MobileTracker.net&#8217;s</a> use of Feedburner&#8217;s feed-serving technology. This allows Feedburner to serve ads within MobileTracker&#8217;s <span class="caps">RSS </span>feed.</p>

<p>To try some <span class="caps">RSS </span>ads out, I used <a href="http://www.bloglines.com">Bloglines</a> to set up a <span class="caps">RSS </span>feed from Mobile.net. The first ad within the feed was attached to a post entitled <a href="http://www.mobiletracker.net/archives/2005/04/06/kyocera-k10-royale"><em>Virgin Mobile launches <span class="caps">K10</span> Royale</em></a> . The ad was for <em>Ring Tones and Wallpapers from Jamster</em> which points to <a href="http://jamster.com/generated/jiw/html/affiliate/index_static_en_US.html?zanpid=1776277C224235522S262522">here</a>.  Here&#8217;s a screenshot this post and ad.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/feedburner_ad1.png" alt="" /></p>

<p>Ok, I might not be their target, but I could see people clicking on that.</p>

<p>The second ad was for <em>Liquid Lense - $13.95</em> which points <a href="http://www.tvproducts2000.net/examples/item144.html">here</a>. It&#8217;s a little off topic from the post&#8217;s content, but you can see the &#8220;match.&#8221; Heck, they might even sell some of the stuff. Liquid Lense, that is. Liquid Lense &#8220;<em>Repairs Scratched &amp; Cloudy Glasses</em>&#8220;&#8230; oh, and for the quality seal of approval&#8230; &#8220;<em>As Seen on TV</em>&#8221;.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/feedburner_ad2.png" alt="" /></p>

<p>And finally, this one.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/feedburner_ad3.png" alt="" /></p>

<p>Which leads to YourMobileDesk.com&#8217;s <a href="http://www.yourmobiledesk.com/products/subcategory.cfm?catID=108&amp;mfrID=189&amp;shmsg=1&amp;list=all&amp;subcatID=278&amp;mfrall=1&amp;OVRAW=zip%20linq&amp;OVKEY=zip%20linq&amp;OVMTC=content">page</a> offering all times of retractable-cable products (like a mini travel mouse). Pretty good.</p>

<p>Man, these are all better than the old days on the GlobalHyperMegaNet with endless ads for <a href="http://www.fuckedcompany.com">ImGonnaFailRealSoon.bomb</a>.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Ads within RSS Feeds... Important Stuff</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/06/19.35.57/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-07T04:12:24Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-07T03:35:57Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.142</id>
<created>2005-04-07T03:35:57Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">So&amp;#8230; some random surfing led me to Scoble&amp;#8217;s post about why Google might be syndication shy. This lead me to Steve Rubel&amp;#8217;s post on that subject which, in turn, lead me to an article on how Overature is working with...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Biz - Internet</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>So&#8230; some random surfing led me to Scoble&#8217;s <a href="http://radio.weblogs.com/0001011/2005/04/06.html#a9821">post</a> about why Google might be syndication shy.</p>

<p>This lead me to Steve Rubel&#8217;s post on that <a href="http://www.micropersuasion.com/2005/04/why_google_is_s.html">subject</a>   which, in turn, lead me to an article on how Overature is working with Feedburner to deliver <a href="http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3439321">ads</a> within <span class="caps">RSS </span>feeds.</p>

<p>That&#8217;s the important point.</p>

<p><a href="http://www.feedburner.com">Feedburner</a>&#8230; Yahoo! or Google should either re-create this service (unlikely) or purchase Feedburner (more likely). Since Feedburner&#8217;s business model places it as an intermediary between blogs and their readers (readers that use <span class="caps">RSS </span>anyway) Yahoo!/Google would be buying reach into blogs. Oh, and they get a <em>little thing</em> called reach into <span class="caps">RSS </span>feeds. <a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/home">Clearly</a> <span class="caps">RSS </span>is looking like it will be a mass-medium&#8230; ie, everyone will use it in the future. </p>

<p>Perhaps in a few years <span class="caps">RSS </span>becomes a big part of how users interact with the web. Heck, you can already get a Gmail <span class="caps">RSS </span><a href="https://gmail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=13474&amp;query=atom&amp;topic=0&amp;type=f&amp;ctx=search">feed</a>, do <a href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/03/22.18.02/">package tracking</a> via <span class="caps">RSS, </span>so why not? Being stuck in the &#8220;old school&#8221; of browsing-only ad serving &#8212; ie, not offering <span class="caps">RSS </span>reach and ad-serving technologies &#8212; could be a huge shortcoming for web media companies.</p>

<p>The Feedburner model is pretty cool&#8230; publishers get ad revenue from their <span class="caps">RSS </span>feeds by merely letting Feedburner <a href="http://www.feedburner.com/fb/a/create">serve</a> the feed, and advertisers get reach into <span class="caps">RSS </span>via a targeted, contextual ad-serving technology. Right on!</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>History Flow &amp;#8212; How Wikipedia Pages Evolve</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/06/19.11.38/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-07T03:24:51Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-07T03:11:38Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.141</id>
<created>2005-04-07T03:11:38Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">History Flow is a tool created by IBM&amp;#8217;s reseach team to study the history of collaborative documents. Specifically, they study how subjects on Wikipedia evolve over time. I found out about History Flow over at Nate Koechley&amp;#8217;s blog. As the...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Biz - Internet</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p><a href="http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/history/index.htm">History Flow</a> is a tool created by <span class="caps">IBM&#8217;</span>s reseach team to study the history of collaborative documents. Specifically, they study how subjects on Wikipedia evolve over time. I found out about History Flow over at Nate Koechley&#8217;s <a href="http://natek.typepad.com/blog/2005/01/wikis_rss_and_w.html">blog</a>. As the <span class="caps">IBM </span>folks say&#8230;</p>

<blockquote><p>history flow provides answers at a glance to questions like, Has a community contributed to the text or has it been mostly written by a single author? How much has a particular contributor influenced the current version of the document? Is the text&#8217;s evolution marked by spurts of intense revision activity or does it reflect a smooth transition from its beginning to the present?</p></blockquote>

<p>Here&#8217;s a screen shot of one of the History Flow displays for term <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam"><em>Islam</em></a>.</p>

<p><a href="http://researchweb.watson.ibm.com/history/gallery.htm"><img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/history_flow.gif" alt="" /></a></p>

<p>This and Jon Udell&#8217;s <a href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/02/27/19.14.47/">screencast</a> looking at how the the heavy-metal umlaut page on Wikipedia evolved give a good overview on how the Wikipedia community is working.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Alexa and Intelliseek &amp;#8212; Roll Your Own Metrics</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/06/16.24.52/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-07T01:00:27Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-07T00:24:52Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.140</id>
<created>2005-04-07T00:24:52Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I used to work at a company that had access to all sorts of marketing and metric reports from the likes of Jupiter Research, Forrester Research, etc. These types of companies can supply you with just about any metric that...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Biz - Internet</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>I used to work at a company that had access to all sorts of marketing and metric reports from the likes of <a href="http://www.jupiterresearch.com/bin/item.pl/home">Jupiter Research</a>, <a href="http://www.forrester.com/my/1,,1-0,FF.html">Forrester Research</a>, etc. These types of companies can supply you with just about any metric that you&#8217;d like in areas that they cover, which is great to get a &#8220;feel&#8221; for a market. Now, I have access to none of these reports.</p>

<p>However, not all is lost thanks to the power of the web. There are a couple of sites out there (and probably more) that let you roll your own metrics: <a href="http://www.forrester.com/my/1,,1-0,FF.html">Alexa</a> and <a href="http://www.intelliseek.com/">Intelliseek</a>.</p>

<p>Alexa, which is owned by Amazon, has a service called <em>Alexa Traffic History Graph</em> found <a href="http://www.alexa.com/site/site_stats/signup?mode=graph">here</a>. This allows you to create traffic graphs in various time domains for any <span class="caps">URL </span>on the web. I created one in a previous <a href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/03/28/10.04.46/">post</a> for WordPress.org to show their rapid growth over the past few months. Below I&#8217;ve created one showing Flickr&#8217;s reach over the past six months.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/flickr_alexa.png" alt="" /></p>

<p>With Intelliseek&#8217;s <a href="http://www.blogpulse.com/trend">BlogPulse</a> you can create a graph that illustrates the percentage of blogs that include your search term vs. various time periods. For example, here&#8217;s one showing the percentage of blogs that mentioned &#8220;Flickr&#8221; over the past six months.</p>

<p><img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/flickr_blogpulse.png" alt="" /></p>

<p>Together these two graphs help illustrates why Yahoo! acquired Flickr.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Bissell ProHeat ProTech Steam Cleaner &amp;#8212; Mini Review</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/06/15.33.06/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-06T23:55:00Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-06T23:33:06Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.139</id>
<created>2005-04-06T23:33:06Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Spring is here! To celebrate, I borrowed a friend&amp;#8217;s Bissell ProHeat ProTech Steam Cleaner that he picked up at Costco for just under $200. The ProHeat is pretty impressive. You load it up with hot tap water in one chamber...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Reviews</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/bissell.jpg" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; float: left;"/>Spring is here! To celebrate, I borrowed a friend&#8217;s <a href="http://www.bissell.com/">Bissell</a> ProHeat ProTech Steam Cleaner that he picked up at <a href="http://www.costco.com/Browse/Product.aspx?prodid=11026784&amp;whse=BC&amp;topnav=&amp;cat=107&amp;hierPath=89%2A107%2A">Costco</a> for just under $200. The ProHeat is pretty impressive. You load it up with hot tap water in one chamber and carpet cleaner (available at most major supermarkets) in another. Plug it in, turn on the heater and suction, and you&#8217;re off. It&#8217;s well balanced, so pushing it around is really easy. A trigger on the handle turns on the water/cleaner which you can see getting sucked back up into the dirty-water reservoir (and I mean <em>dirty</em>).</p>

<p>My friend said that he had hired a professional to clean his carpets before he purchased the Bissell. He really didn&#8217;t like the job the &#8220;pro&#8221; did, so he picked up the Bissell which he said did a much better job.</p>

<p>The Bissell did a great job on my carpet which had several food stains here and there. I don&#8217;t think that I&#8217;d buy one for myself, since I don&#8217;t have own a house, but it&#8217;s great to borrow. If I did own a house that had a lot of carpet, it&#8217;d probably be worth it.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Package Tracking by RSS</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/03/22.18.02/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-04T06:32:11Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-04T06:18:02Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.138</id>
<created>2005-04-04T06:18:02Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Bloglines an online RSS reader (recently purchased by Ask Jeeves which in turn is being aquired by Barry Diller&amp;#8217;s IAC/InterActiveCorp) announced last week that Bloglines is First to Go Beyond the Blog with Unique-to-Me Info Updates. What does that mean?...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Biz - Internet</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.bloglines.com">Bloglines</a> an online <span class="caps">RSS </span>reader (recently <a href="http://www.bloglines.com/about/pr_02082005">purchased</a> by Ask Jeeves which in turn is being <a href="http://www.irconnect.com/askjinc/pages/news_releases.html?d=74889">aquired</a> by Barry Diller&#8217;s <span class="caps">IAC</span>/InterActiveCorp) <a href="http://www.bloglines.com/about/pr_03302005">announced</a> last week that <em>Bloglines is First to Go Beyond the Blog with Unique-to-Me Info Updates</em>. What does that mean?</p>

<blockquote><p>Starting today, people can track the shipping progress of package deliveries from some of the world’s largest parcel shipping companies—FedEx, <span class="caps">UPS, </span>and the United States Postal Service within their Bloglines MyFeeds page. Package tracking in Bloglines encompasses international shipments, in English. Bloglines readers can look forward to collecting more kinds of unique-to-me information on Bloglines in the near future, such as neighborhood weather updates and stock portfolio tracking.</p></blockquote>

<p>You can check out the package tracking <a href="http://www.bloglines.com/preview?siteid=11967&amp;itemid=79">here</a>.</p>

<p>With <span class="caps">IE7 </span><a href="http://www.microsoft-watch.com/article2/0,1995,1776290,00.asp">rumored</a> to have a built-in <span class="caps">RSS </span>reader, services like Blogline&#8217;s package tracking and My Yahoo!&#8217;s <span class="caps">RSS </span><a href="http://my.yahoo.com/s/about/rss/?.src=my&amp;.page=&amp;.done=">integration</a>, <span class="caps">RSS </span>(or some type of syndication&#8230; why do we have <span class="caps">RSS,</span> Atom, et al.?) sure seems like it will be mainstream pretty soon.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Two New PocketPC-based QWERTY Mobiles</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/03/21.21.15/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-06T03:16:40Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-04T05:21:15Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.137</id>
<created>2005-04-04T05:21:15Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">There&amp;#8217;s a couple of new QWERTY-keyboard equipped PocketPC-based mobiles out in the market (or will be soon). The Orange SPV M2000 has pretty much everything&amp;#8230; WiFi, Bluetooth and a side-out QWERTY keyboard. Unfortunately, it&amp;#8217;s not as small as the HTC...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Biz - Mobile</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a couple of new <span class="caps">QWERTY</span>-keyboard equipped PocketPC-based mobiles out in the market (or will be soon).</p>

<p><img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/m2000.jpg" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; float: left;"/>The <a href="http://shop.orange.co.uk/shop/show/handset/spv_m2000/detail">Orange <span class="caps">SPV M2000</span></a> has pretty much everything&#8230; WiFi, Bluetooth and a side-out <span class="caps">QWERTY </span>keyboard. Unfortunately, it&#8217;s not as small as the <a href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/02/15/13.23.48/"><span class="caps">HTC</span> Magician</a>. Since this is an Orange phone, it&#8217;s only available in Europe (or maybe you&#8217;ll be able to gray market it someday from sites like <a href="http://www.dweiniger.com/">this</a>).</p>

<p><br /><br />
<br /><br />
<img src="http://www.zoinger.com/img/h6500.jpg" style="margin: 0px 5px 5px 0px; float: left;"/><span class="caps">HP&#8217;</span>s iPaq Mobile Messenger <a href="http://www.msmobiles.com/news.php/3587.html">h6500</a> is due out in April. It&#8217;s got an integrated <span class="caps">QWERTY </span>keyboard similar to the Treo. It trades built-in WiFi for <span class="caps">GPS </span>which seems like an odd trade off to me. However, you will be able to add a WiFi card through the SD/IO slot (it as another slot for miniSD), and you&#8217;ll have the benefit of being able to break the antenna end of the card off. Add-in WiFi-card solutions suck&#8230; like so 1999. Additionally, the screen is fairly low resolution at 240&#215;240. It&#8217;s mostly smaller than the <span class="caps">M2000, </span>but not close to the Magician.</p>

<table class="center" style="width:400px;margin-left:auto;margin-right:auto" cellspacing="0"><tr><td>Product</td><td>Length</td><td>Width</td><td>Thickness</td></tr><tr><td><span class="caps">M2000</span></td><td>4.92&#8221;</td><td>3.00&#8221;</td><td>0.74&#8221;</td></tr><tr><td>h6500</td><td>4.65&#8221;</td><td>2.80&#8221;</td><td>0.83&#8221;</td></tr><tr><td>Magician</td><td>4.25&#8221;</td><td>2.28&#8221;</td><td>0.71&#8221;</td></tr><tr><td>Audiovox <span class="caps">SMT5600</span>*</td><td>4.25&#8221;</td><td>1.81&#8221;</td><td>0.63&#8221;</td></tr><tr><td>Treo**</td><td>4.40&#8221;</td><td>2.30&#8221;</td><td>0.90&#8221;</td></tr><tr><td><small>*MS SmartPhone</small></td></tr><tr><td><small>**Dimensions not including external antenna</small></td></tr></table>

<p>I&#8217;m still waiting for a PocketPC mobile the size of the Magician that has a built-in <span class="caps">QWERTY </span>keyboard, WiFi and Bluetooth. <span class="caps">GPS </span>is highly optional for me.</p>

<p><em><strong>Update: 2005_04_05</strong></em><br />
To partially solve the problem of SD WiFi cards sticking out of the slot, <a href="http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000273038793/">here&#8217;s</a> a stubby one from Spectec.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Flickr &amp;#8212; What was Google Thinking??</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/02/10.03.27/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-02T18:30:58Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-02T18:03:27Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.136</id>
<created>2005-04-02T18:03:27Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">I&amp;#8217;m sure that everyone has heard that Yahoo! recently acquired Flickr. In my opinion, this was a brilliant, strategic move. Flickr has the &amp;#8220;feel&amp;#8221; of an early Hotmail or Paypal and maybe even Ebay (hey, with those tags you can...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Biz - Internet</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that everyone has heard that Yahoo! recently acquired Flickr. In my opinion, this was a brilliant, strategic move. Flickr has the &#8220;feel&#8221; of an early Hotmail or Paypal and maybe even Ebay (hey, with those tags you can definitely see some network effects going on).</p>

<p>Sure Flickr&#8217;s not making money now, but who cares when you are acquiring users like mad? It&#8217;s like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homesteading">homesteading</a> right now. Land, that is users, will never, ever be this inexpensive to acquire, so &#8220;Internet companies&#8221; better make the most of it <acronym title="right fucking now">RFN</acronym>.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s interesting that Yahoo! would buy Flickr in that Yahoo! already has Yahoo! Photos. Yahoo!&#8217;s been in the online photo business for many years now, and is probably doing pretty well. However, the Flickr acquisition could end up making them <em>the</em> online image archive of choice.</p>

<p>Google&#8217;s Picasa is a fine little application, but that&#8217;s it. It&#8217;s not an online image store (yet?), and doesn&#8217;t have any network effects (yet?).</p>

<p>So <acronym title="what the fuck">WTF</acronym> was Google thinking in letting Yahoo! snatch up Flickr? You go <span class="caps">IPO </span>to generate a pile of cash that you use to grow the company (oh, and to make a bunch of insiders rich). With Google&#8217;s P/E ratio, investors want to see that <span class="caps">IPO </span>cash working&#8230; not sitting in some bank earning a negative real interest rate (heard of inflation lately?).</p>

<p>In other words, Google needed Flickr more than Yahoo!. And more along that line of math: everyone will own a cellphone in the future + every cellphone will have a camera + everyone loves photos + everyone loves <em>sharing</em> photos = a really, really big, strategic market.</p>

<p>Acqusitions are like movies. Out of 10, 7 will be duds, 2 will break even and 1 will be mega-hit. I&#8217;d say there&#8217;s a better than 10% chance that Flickr will be a hit, and make Yahoo! a pile of cash in the future.</p>

<p>Google, what where you thinking???</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Yahoo!&apos;s Digital Printing Strategy</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/04/02/09.41.41/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-22T22:30:25Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-02T17:41:41Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.135</id>
<created>2005-04-02T17:41:41Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Here&amp;#8217;s my feelings on digital printing. Home printers suck&amp;#8230; too expensive and hard to do (and is reflected in the dropping market share of home printing vs. retail and online). Online services (like Shutterfly and Ofoto) are nice, but cost...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>Digital Photo</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s my feelings on digital printing. Home printers suck&#8230; too expensive and hard to do (and is reflected in the dropping market share of home printing vs. retail and online). Online services (like Shutterfly and Ofoto) are nice, but cost more than retail, and have to be mailed to you. Retail printing is great, but do you really want Costco or Walmart to store all of your photos? Are they going to have cool tagging services like Flickr. Ahhh, I think not.</p>

<p>So the best &#8220;solution&#8221; is for Yahoo! and the retailers to get together, and allow Yahoo! Photos/Flickr digital images to be printed at the retailer of the <em>user&#8217;s</em> preference. I don&#8217;t want Yahoo! to have some sort of &#8220;preferred,&#8221; exclusive printing relationship, I want choice. For example, I&#8217;d love to upload all my images to Flickr, and have them printed out at my local Costco (which you can&#8217;t beat for price and quality). In addition, I am not so wild about having Yahoo! <em>print</em> my photos, and mail them too me. Costco et al., are always going to beat Yahoo! in cost, convenience and probably quality.</p>

<p>However, the retailers probably are still thinking it&#8217;s 1998, and they can become the center of a person&#8217;s digital image world. That is, they think their brands equal &#8220;cool, online, trustworthy, perpetual digital-image store.&#8221; Again, I think not. Do you really trust Wal-Mart to store all of your images <em>forever</em>? Yeah, right&#8230; lemme offshore that to where ever, and, oh and sorry, you&#8217;ll have to upload all of your images.</p>

<p>Yahoo! probably thinks it can own the world and that all of it&#8217;s users will want to use their online service. This, of course, is myopic.</p>

<p>I&#8217;m waiting for the day when reasonable minds prevail, and everyone figures out that:<br />
Yahoo!&#8217;s brand = cool, progressive, perpetual, trustworthy, future-proof digital image archive<br />
Retailers&#8217; brand = great price, convenience, transaction for digital images</p>

<p><em><strong>Update:2005_04_22</strong></em><br />
Yahoo! and Target have announced plans that will allow Yahoo! members to print their online photos at Target (Flickr will probably be included too). I imagine that Target paid Yahoo! a &#8220;distribution&#8221; fee (perhaps payable in advertising on the Yahoo! Network), will have to promote Yahoo! Photos in their stores and will share some of the print revenue with Yahoo!. Yahoo! will most likely have to offer some promotion of the Target service within Yahoo! Photos. Yahoo! probably had leverage in this deal, since it was widely reported that Target has been late to the online photo game.</p>

<p>I think this is a good deal for both companies. It&#8217;s a good brand match&#8230; both companies are upbrand-mainstream (that is, an up brand from the likes of WalMart).</p>

<p>In the future (assuming Yahoo! plays it&#8217;s card right), Yahoo! should be able to capture a disproportionate share of the online digital assets market. This will increase their leverage over retail printing shops, so they should be able to demand a large revenue share of the printing fees.</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>How Do You Spell Netgear Router Relief? L-I-N-K-S-Y-S</title>
<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.zoinger.com/archives/2005/03/31/16.43.58/index.html" />
<modified>2005-04-01T01:02:29Z</modified>
<issued>2005-04-01T00:43:58Z</issued>
<id>tag:www.zoinger.com,2005://2.134</id>
<created>2005-04-01T00:43:58Z</created>
<summary type="text/plain">Posts have been a bit slow over the past few days. In fact, there have been no posts. Why? A little Netgear WGT624 (v2) router melt down. The original problem with the router was very mysterious. It seemed to work...</summary>
<author>
<name>DanoSchmano</name>


</author>
<dc:subject>PC - General</dc:subject>
<content type="text/html" mode="escaped" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.zoinger.com/">
<![CDATA[<p>Posts have been a bit slow over the past few days. In fact, there have been no posts. Why? A little Netgear <span class="caps">WGT624 </span>(v2) router melt down.</p>

<p>The original problem with the router was very mysterious. It seemed to work fine, but I was having intermittent problems connecting to this site (Zoinger.com). Eventually, I couldn&#8217;t connect at all. My browser would just time out.</p>

<p>Of course, I thought this was my host&#8217;s (1and1) fault. A call to them indicated that this was not the case. Next up, Charter Communications, my cable modem supplier. Nope, they could get to Zoinger.com no problemo, but they did suggest that it might be the router.</p>

<p><span class="caps">WTF</span>? The router. No waaay. However, by this time, about 5-6 hours worth of debugging time, I was getting desperate. I removed the router from my set up and&#8230; low and behold, I could get to Zoinger.com.</p>

<p>Indeed, it was the router causing the problem. I searched on Netgear&#8217;s &#8220;support&#8221; site (what a joke), and could find no reference to this issue. I then tried downgrading the firmware to an old version to no avail. Then I found <a href="http://forum1.netgear.com/support/viewtopic.php?t=1238&amp;highlight=yellow">this</a> post on the Netgear forum site. <strong>19</strong> pages of people having a similar problem with no official response from Netgear.</p>

<p>I&#8217;ve owned routers from Sonicwall, <span class="caps">SMC </span>and Cisco and have <strong>never</strong> had a problem with any of them. My Netgear router has had problems from day one (it really doesn&#8217;t like renewing the dynamic IP address and would hang all the time requiring a reboot).</p>

<p>So how is Netgear router relief spelled? Linksys <span class="caps">WRT54G&#8230; </span>the damn router I should have purchased in the first place.</p>

<p><span class="caps">P.S.</span> I wish I would have used Skype when I called Netgear&#8217;s technical support line. The router has a pretty cool feature to automatically upgrade the firmware. However, during an upgrade in my debugging process the router hung which ended up frying it. Anyway, the tech support person asked me <strong>why</strong> I would use the feature&#8230; implying that you really shouldn&#8217;t. <span class="caps">OMG, </span>it&#8217;s only the first thing you see when you boot into the admin screen, and it is all the time asking you if you want to upgrade when a new firmware version comes out. Classic!</p>]]>

</content>
</entry>

</feed>